Which is exactly what it needed to be. That's why cars which do extensive stop and go/idling service have to follow the heavy duty service intervals on oil changes, while cars that see highway use follow the light duty service intervals. The time in the 220-230 temps is getting in the optimal range for oil longevity. I think you are misinterpreting my post, which was to say that unlike coolant temps, you want the oil to be hotter than water boiling temperatures a significant portion of the time. And even the strangely vociferous support for low coolant temperatures on this forum is somewhat misplaced. Sure, you don't want to overheat the engine, but people seem to believe that if their engine goes above 190 degree coolant temperature they are going to blow up their engine or something. In fact, overcooling the engine isn't good for it either.
I think people get an accessport and become obssessed with watching numbers. In this case (Fiesta ST), it's a number that's not even real.
By the way, the temperatures I quoted were not my own; they came from automotive information websites. But I've been an automotive enthusiast for longer than most of you have been alive, and it's the same as it's always been.
I think people get an accessport and become obssessed with watching numbers. In this case (Fiesta ST), it's a number that's not even real.
By the way, the temperatures I quoted were not my own; they came from automotive information websites. But I've been an automotive enthusiast for longer than most of you have been alive, and it's the same as it's always been.
Fuel acts as a solvent, and can thin out the oil's viscosity, lowering it's protection of bearings, lifters/cam followers, and upper cylinder walls and rings, so you do NOT want it in your oil.
Fuel is also not a good engine lubricant at all.
Last edited: