Sure, but the age old comment about displacement is wrong. There is a replacement: forced induction.
Also I’m not sure that a 2 liter with a KP39 would pass more volume than our engine, since it is the limiting factor on flow as revs climb above 5 grand. I have to imagine a 2L would hit a wall much earlier than that engine speed.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I was poking fun at you with that displacement comment glad to see you took it so seriously.
Forced induction while flowing more is limited by how much the head will flow. We can go around in circles over this till we actually know how much the 2 liter head will flow vs the 1.6 stock for stock. Back in the day that is why people would put larger valves in heads to help them flow more even with forced induction.
I am betting the 2 liter head has larger valves than the 1.6 so it should flow more as well as having a larger combustion chamber because of larger bottom end i.e. more area to push more induction capability to pack a bigger charge .
No matter what you want to argue, a bigger turbo on a 2 liter will put out more power than a bigger turbo turbo on a 1.6. You just can’t get around that fact if you are going to go at it from a even standpoint. You cannot compare a larger turbo on the 1.6 to the stock turbo on the 2.0 liter because thats not stock for stock.
Anyways I have made my point there is science behind it. I am done here have a nice day.
plus I am not even sure why we are debating this at this point beyond one side wanting to prove the other side is wrong. lol its a useless debate and waste of time at this point. lol