Turbo Technics S280

Se7eN

Senior Member
Member ID
#2001
Messages
904
Likes
786
I was saying aux fuel on 93 ain't worth the cost. If you don't have ethanol, then run meth.
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
that is true, literally maybe get 10whp more with aux on just 93oct. You only see a real upgrade on Ethanol or maybe Race Gas.
 


wetwea33

Active member
Member ID
#8616
Messages
634
Likes
494
So your saying 93 with six isn’t worth it. Only worth it if you run e blend.
Yeah if you don't have access to ethanol, then running meth would be the better decision.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 


MagnetiseST

1000 Post Club
Premium Account
Member ID
#7855
Messages
1,318
Likes
1,166
was going to post about SPA again, but just remembered that I already ordered the meth-charge pipe from CPE.

I'm getting meth. I'm going that route. It is done.
 


Se7eN

Senior Member
Member ID
#2001
Messages
904
Likes
786
have to decide on a kit from Snow Performance now, probably would have cost just as much to go SPA hahaha
That is a very good kit, I think the only recommendation would be a filter before the nozzle and a switch to turn it off and on so you are not constantly using it.
 


JDG

1000 Post Club
Premium Account
Member ID
#6691
Messages
1,862
Likes
1,987
Might have to upgrade again.... oof




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 


MagnetiseST

1000 Post Club
Premium Account
Member ID
#7855
Messages
1,318
Likes
1,166
Might have to upgrade again.... oof




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Do you daily your car at all? They're recommending internals and whatnot for the S290 and their engine dyno results are not with a stock 1.6EB
 


JDG

1000 Post Club
Premium Account
Member ID
#6691
Messages
1,862
Likes
1,987
Do you daily your car at all? They're recommending internals and whatnot for the S290 and their engine dyno results are not with a stock 1.6EB
I'm half kidding. I love the spool of the S280 so if any of that goes away with the S290 I likely wouldn't upgrade. Those initial dyno graphs definitely show slower spool. I plan to eventually build my engine, yes.
 


MagnetiseST

1000 Post Club
Premium Account
Member ID
#7855
Messages
1,318
Likes
1,166
I'm half kidding. I love the spool of the S280 so if any of that goes away with the S290 I likely wouldn't upgrade. Those initial dyno graphs definitely show slower spool. I plan to eventually build my engine, yes.
I think it would be a great turbo with the right supporting setup but i don't see it working as well on a stock engine. I think the S280 is the best all around-er
 


Member ID
#9436
Messages
159
Likes
175
Who are you guys using to tune this turbo? JST? Stratified? Is it normal to have 7 revisions on a tune? That seems high to me. If I got this turbo and wanted an e30 and a 91 tune how many data logs and revisions should I expect to go through?
 


JDG

1000 Post Club
Premium Account
Member ID
#6691
Messages
1,862
Likes
1,987
Who are you guys using to tune this turbo? JST? Stratified? Is it normal to have 7 revisions on a tune? That seems high to me. If I got this turbo and wanted an e30 and a 91 tune how many data logs and revisions should I expect to go through?
Yup, pretty normal. If you read the thread, all of us have said who we are tuning with. If that seems high to you, you can travel to a reputable pro-tuner who has ecoboost experience and have him/her perform the tune on a dyno. Should take 2-3 hours to the cost of ~$750-1000. Likely 10-12 revisions per fuel choice.
 


Se7eN

Senior Member
Member ID
#2001
Messages
904
Likes
786
Who are you guys using to tune this turbo? JST? Stratified? Is it normal to have 7 revisions on a tune? That seems high to me. If I got this turbo and wanted an e30 and a 91 tune how many data logs and revisions should I expect to go through?
Personally I've had up to 20+ revisions when dealing with minor issues. On even normal tune it might take that long if the tuner is taking his time in adjusting little increments. So don't expect to have 3 revisions do 91oct and 3 on E30, also for E30 you'll most likely need aux fuel.
 


Se7eN

Senior Member
Member ID
#2001
Messages
904
Likes
786
Yup, pretty normal. If you read the thread, all of us have said who we are tuning with. If that seems high to you, you can travel to a reputable pro-tuner who has ecoboost experience and have him/her perform the tune on a dyno. Should take 2-3 hours to the cost of ~$750-1000. Likely 10-12 revisions per fuel choice.
Even then, on a dyno it might take 10 or 12 pulls to get it right, even slight adjustments after since the dyno is not the same as running on the road.
 


Member ID
#9436
Messages
159
Likes
175
Thanks for the info guys. I now have a much better idea what to expect w the e-tune process. I’m in NM and have an e85 station 1 mile away, but sadly no 93 octane, just 91 (same as I had in Cali). Somehow I can justify the cost of the turbo and supporting mods, but I can’t see myself doing aux. Therefore I guess the hybrid is the better choice because I prefer running e30. If only the hybrid was $1350-1400, how easy the choice would be!
 


wetwea33

Active member
Member ID
#8616
Messages
634
Likes
494
Thanks for the info guys. I now have a much better idea what to expect w the e-tune process. I’m in NM and have an e85 station 1 mile away, but sadly no 93 octane, just 91 (same as I had in Cali). Somehow I can justify the cost of the turbo and supporting mods, but I can’t see myself doing aux. Therefore I guess the hybrid is the better choice because I prefer running e30. If only the hybrid was $1350-1400, how easy the choice would be!
I would still go with the s280 and save up for aux over time. You could run 4 port and run straight e85.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 


gtx3076

1000 Post Club
Member ID
#11673
Messages
1,213
Likes
1,397
Has anybody tried tuning on E20 on the stock fuel system or is it just not worth running any ethanol on this turbo without port injection?

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
 


Similar threads



Top