Thread Starter
#41
Thread Starter
#41
As far as I am concerned, most of the lowering springs are softer than stock spring rates. Swift being an exception to that rule, (however until I test them I won't say that with certainty). As proven by my debacle with the Suspension Techniques lowering springs and their BS about the rate compared to what I actually measured, I don't think the Spring companies actually do any real testing on their products.
I think the ST springs were 1in shorter than the OE Fiesta ST springs. Combine that with the 1in shorter B8 damper and they are stupid low. in my opinion. You can see the difference between the ST spring on the B8 and OE spring on the B8.
The other issue I had, there wasn't enough preload on the lowering spring to get the car far enough away from the bump stops. When I was driving the ST lowering spring on the B8s, there may have been 1in of free travel until the bumpstop touched the damper. This was at static ride height.
The B8 will affect droop travel, you will lose an inch.
I think the ST springs were 1in shorter than the OE Fiesta ST springs. Combine that with the 1in shorter B8 damper and they are stupid low. in my opinion. You can see the difference between the ST spring on the B8 and OE spring on the B8.
The other issue I had, there wasn't enough preload on the lowering spring to get the car far enough away from the bump stops. When I was driving the ST lowering spring on the B8s, there may have been 1in of free travel until the bumpstop touched the damper. This was at static ride height.
The B8 will affect droop travel, you will lose an inch.