• Sign Up! To view all forums and unlock additional cool features

    Welcome to the #1 Fiesta ST Forum and Fiesta ST community dedicated to Fiesta ST owners and enthusiasts. Register for an account, it's free and it's easy, so don't hesitate to join the Fiesta ST Forum today!


How-To: Stock Height Rally Performance Springs for OEM/B6 style suspension

Messages
49
Likes
65
Location
Irvine, CA
#21
Thank you for putting this together. I’ve installed 10” 3/2.5” #225/200 springs from FOA on B6 with DNA camber plates. I am coming from 2015 springs with 85k+. Most of suspension components were recently replaced and installed by me with the B6 on OEM springs. DNA arms, spherical bushings & adjustable torsion bar.

With the 10” springs, the car has been lifted about 1/2” in the front & nearly an inch in the rear using crude measurements after the initial install. Very little settling has occurred since but handling is exactly like stock. The noticeable improvements are the initial response and lateral grip. I quite enjoy the way the vehicle transitions & takes compressions with authority now . I have a few track days scheduled this month and will have more to add soon.
 


Messages
49
Likes
65
Location
Irvine, CA
#22
Thank you for putting this together. I’ve installed 10” 3/2.5” #225/200 springs from FOA on B6 with DNA camber plates. I am coming from 2015 springs with 85k+. Most of suspension components were recently replaced and installed by me with the B6 on OEM springs. DNA arms, spherical bushings & adjustable torsion bar.

With the 10” springs, the car has been lifted about 1/2” in the front & nearly an inch in the rear using crude measurements after the initial install. Very little settling has occurred since but handling is exactly like stock. The noticeable improvements are the initial response and lateral grip. I quite enjoy the way the vehicle transitions & takes compressions with authority now . I have a few track days scheduled this month and will have more to add soon.
Attaching photos wasn’t working, but now it is
View attachment IMG_6394.jpeg
 


OP
Dialcaliper

Dialcaliper

Senior Member
Messages
905
Likes
1,475
Location
San Francisco Bay Area
Thread Starter #24
Thank you for putting this together. I’ve installed 10” 3/2.5” #225/200 springs from FOA on B6 with DNA camber plates. I am coming from 2015 springs with 85k+. Most of suspension components were recently replaced and installed by me with the B6 on OEM springs. DNA arms, spherical bushings & adjustable torsion bar.

With the 10” springs, the car has been lifted about 1/2” in the front & nearly an inch in the rear using crude measurements after the initial install. Very little settling has occurred since but handling is exactly like stock. The noticeable improvements are the initial response and lateral grip. I quite enjoy the way the vehicle transitions & takes compressions with authority now . I have a few track days scheduled this month and will have more to add soon.
Thanks for sharing. Curious, did you take your measurements at the balljoint bolts per the factory spec, or just a relative height measurement. The photo doesn’t look visibly lifted, does it look more obvious in person? I’d be curious how your ride height actually measures out, as there’s a +/- 0.5” tolerance on the factory ride height and I’m not sure why. (Base fiesta ride height spec is much tighter)

The very slight settling I experienced wasn’t obvious until after several thousand miles of driving, as everything seats and compresses.
 


Messages
49
Likes
65
Location
Irvine, CA
#25
Thanks for sharing. Curious, did you take your measurements at the balljoint bolts per the factory spec, or just a relative height measurement. The photo doesn’t look visibly lifted, does it look more obvious in person? I’d be curious how your ride height actually measures out, as there’s a +/- 0.5” tolerance on the factory ride height and I’m not sure why. (Base fiesta ride height spec is much tighter)
Just a relative height measurement in my garage from ground to center of the wheel arch at all 4 corners before & after. I couldn’t wrap my head around how to do the factory measuring so I just went with what I know.

In person is a slight lift and the control arms are about 2-3cm from sitting level in the front.
 


OP
Dialcaliper

Dialcaliper

Senior Member
Messages
905
Likes
1,475
Location
San Francisco Bay Area
Thread Starter #26
Just a relative height measurement in my garage from ground to center of the wheel arch at all 4 corners before & after. I couldn’t wrap my head around how to do the factory measuring so I just went with what I know.

In person is a slight lift and the control arms are about 2-3cm from sitting level in the front.
Makes sense. The factory measurement just involves measuring the height from the (flat) ground to the center of the nearest convenient pivot bolt head, then subtract the two

In the front, that’s the front control arm bolt and the balljoint pinch bolt. In the rear it’s the torsion beam pivot bolt and the bolt where the shock lower eye attaches. Not perfect, but convenient reference points that relate directly to suspension geometry without the variability of panel gaps and straightness.

You technically measure both sides front and rear (4 corners) and compare with the spec
 


Messages
172
Likes
110
Location
London, ON, Canada
#28
I have a few more questions:
1. Do you think standard 10" coilover springs could still work in the rear without the helper spring?
2. Could you describe what the camlock gaskets do?
3. Did you by chance look into repurposing OEM equivalent springs for other vehicles? For instance, I see the 2000-2005 Sentra rear springs aren't too far off (but maybe not close enough) to the fronts you selected; pigtail one side, square other side, 11" length, 3.5" ID, 232 lbs/inch. They're <$30 a pair on Amazon. 2015-2020
FWD Chevy trax rear springs look possible too, but I I don't know if pigtail/pigtail ends would be a problem, but they are wider diameter overall. haven't found the spring rate yet.
Edit, I think spring rate could be roughly calculated like this:
Rock auto Free Height (in)9.84
Rock Auto Installed Height (in)7.29
Trax FWD curb weight: 3048lbs * 55% front / 2 = 328 lbs/inch. So too high.

Edit Again: R56 Mini Copper rears looks promising for the front:
Length256 mm (10")
Outer Diameter 112 mm (4.4")
Thickness 12.5 mm (.5")
212lbs/inch
~$35/pair.
Pictures look like square one side, pigtail other side. Any thoughts on whether this might work?
 


Last edited:
Messages
49
Likes
65
Location
Irvine, CA
#30
For what it’s worth, I have tried a few different spring rates now, I’ll have to get the current ride height measured out.

225/200 spring rates is great on the street and track, but the car understeers at the limit, just like stock. With an adjustable torsion bar on the hardest setting it will lift the inside tire off the ground, but rotation is near perfect.

I then tried #250 rear springs with the adjustable bar on the softest setting. This does keep both rear tires on the ground, but the rear has too much grip & not enough slip angle to rotate adequately through a turn at the limit. It drives great on the street & seems to cancel out front oscillations quicker. I would need a x9”+ wheel up front to run this setup on track. I don’t think a squared wheel setup is ideal for this car, but there are zero options for x9” wheels at this time. My only option is redrilling for 4x100.

I am now running 250/250. This is my favorite setup so far. It’s great on street, still need to get it on a racetrack. The only test left after that is rallycross… and no doubt the rally spring setup is going to be perfect for that as well.

FOA always has the springs to me next day, so I don’t see any reason to look for other options or vendors, but once I dial in the rates that I want I’ll be looking for Swift or Eibachs to replace these. It’s important to remember that up front the 3” springs that are spec’d allow for more wheel/tire clearance compared to OEM. Going with an OE style spring (4”+) will reduce clearance and the ability to introduce more negative camber.

Edit: I am also considering trying a different bumpstop in the rear.

View attachment IMG_7486.jpeg
 


Last edited:
OP
Dialcaliper
Messages
905
Likes
1,475
Location
San Francisco Bay Area
Thread Starter #31
I have a few more questions:
1. Do you think standard 10" coilover springs could still work in the rear without the helper spring?
2. Could you describe what the camlock gaskets do?
3. Did you by chance look into repurposing OEM equivalent springs for other vehicles? For instance, I see the 2000-2005 Sentra rear springs aren't too far off (but maybe not close enough) to the fronts you selected; pigtail one side, square other side, 11" length, 3.5" ID, 232 lbs/inch. They're <$30 a pair on Amazon. 2015-2020
FWD Chevy trax rear springs look possible too, but I I don't know if pigtail/pigtail ends would be a problem, but they are wider diameter overall. haven't found the spring rate yet.
Edit, I think spring rate could be roughly calculated like this:
Rock auto Free Height (in)9.84
Rock Auto Installed Height (in)7.29
Trax FWD curb weight: 3048lbs * 55% front / 2 = 328 lbs/inch. So too high.

Edit Again: 2011 Mini Copper looks promising:
Length256 mm (10")
Outer Diameter 112 mm (4.4")
Thickness 12.5 mm (.5")
~$35/pair.
Pictures look like square one side, pigtail other side. Any thoughts on whether this might work?
Our rear springs are barrel shaped, with top and bottom seats right around 2.5” ID (~5” OD). Standard coilover springs drop right in

The rear spring needs free length in droop of at least 10.5” plus a little extra to keep the spring seated, so the 10” spring needs the helper so it doesn’t just fall out. Aftermarket springs basically have built in helper coils (tightly wound section). The OEM spring works because the spring rate is lower, so more compression for the same ride height. Free length is around 11-11.5”’stock, so just barely long enough. Anything stiffer and keeping the same ride height would either be too short and fall out, or make the car sit much higher in the rear.

The helpers just solve the problem by taking up the extra length in droop and compressing flat at ride height.

All the camlock gaskets (and the bearing) in the front do is basically the exact same thing. Front droop length is roughly 10-5/8”. I was intending to use helpers in the front, but it’s close enough with the 10” spring that a simple spacer just happens to work just right. The 3.0”ID spring has flattened ends instead of a single coil end so kit sits tighter and makes the whole thing work.

There’s nothing special about the bearing or the gasket at all, except that they just solve happen to come in a massive variety of exact sizes that are easy to choose from to get the fit I wanted, and also the dimensions are published and easy to search up instead of just going by trial and error. Literally any other ring shaped thing the right size would work!

Edit: rechecked my measurements on the rear. Accidentally quoted the extra droop travel from my new setup instead of the stock rear shocks
 


Last edited:
Messages
172
Likes
110
Location
London, ON, Canada
#32
Our rear springs are barrel shaped, with top and bottom seats right around 2.5” ID (~5” OD). Standard coilover springs drop right in

The rear spring needs free length in droop of at least 11.5” plus a bit to keep the spring seated, so the 10” spring needs the helper so it doesn’t just fall out. Aftermarket springs basically have built in helper coils (tightly wound section). The OEM spring works because the spring rate is lower, so more compression for the same ride height. Free length is around 11.75”-12” stock, so just barely long enough. Anything stiffer and keeping the same ride height would either be too short and fall out, or make the car sit much higher in the rear.

The helpers just solve the problem by taking up the extra length in droop and compressing flat at ride height.

All the camlock gaskets (and the bearing) in the front do is basically the exact same thing. Front droop length is roughly 10-5/8”. I was intending to use helpers in the front, but it’s close enough with the 10” spring that a simple spacer just happens to work just right. The 3.0”ID spring has flattened ends instead of a single coil end so kit sits tighter and makes the whole thing work.

There’s nothing special about the bearing or the gasket at all, except that they just solve happen to come in a massive variety of exact sizes that are easy to choose from to get the fit I wanted, and also the dimensions are published and easy to search up instead of just going by trial and error. Literally any other ring shaped thing the right size would work!
Thanks for the reply.

Would you happen to have measurements, or estimates of min/max ID/OD of the top and bottom seating surfaces of the front vs. rear shocks & mounts? I'm attempting to determine if I can use repurposed OEM springs of different sizes.

In my old miata race car, the springs weren't fully seated at full droop in the coilover sleeves, but it never seemed to be an issue. Perhaps the sleeves helped keep the springs from moving around side to side too much at full droop. I remember reading about crude droop limiters too (chains). It sounds like you feel the springs need to be seated in this context. Perhaps damage/odds of unseating are lower at tracks and with lower mileage vs. a street car.
 


OP
Dialcaliper
Messages
905
Likes
1,475
Location
San Francisco Bay Area
Thread Starter #33
Thanks for the reply.

Would you happen to have measurements, or estimates of min/max ID/OD of the top and bottom seating surfaces of the front vs. rear shocks & mounts? I'm attempting to determine if I can use repurposed OEM springs of different sizes.

In my old miata race car, the springs weren't fully seated at full droop in the coilover sleeves, but it never seemed to be an issue. Perhaps the sleeves helped keep the springs from moving around side to side too much at full droop. I remember reading about crude droop limiters too (chains). It sounds like you feel the springs need to be seated in this context. Perhaps damage/odds of unseating are lower at tracks and with lower mileage vs. a street car.
It’s especially important that the rear springs stay seated as they are divorced from the shocks, hence free as a bird. If they unseat in droop, they can literally fly out the back of the car where a coil-on-spring setup will at least stay roughly in place, especially if there’s spring is tight around an accordion boot

Unseated is never good, which is why helpers were invented, coil bind is also bad but you can get away with odd stuff on racetracks to skirt weird rules, in ways that don’t fly on a long term installation on a street car.

Getting into actual suspension mechanics, Unseating also does weird things to suspension behavior if you actually encounter a big enough bump/dip, with zero spring force for part of the travel, you essentially lose tire contact with the road briefly. Not end of the world on a straight, but bad for overall grip

Here are my messy notes on the stock spring measurements.

Front 2019 spring measurements
5.25” Dia, 4.25” Ends ~12” Free Length, 7/16” wire, 3.5-4 Live Coils 0.49”
Rear 2019 Spring
4.25” Dia, 3” Ends, ~11.5” Free Length, 0.435 Wire, 5.5-6 live coils

2014-2016 Springs
Front 0.505” wire
Rear 0.440” wire 11” Free length[/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE]


Other thing to add is that the plastic bearing above the flange of the front spring boot is tapered, hence the 80mm bearing used as a spacer. The OEM accordion boot is tapered in that area. The OEM front springs are actually slightly larger than 3.0” ID, but the fact that they end in a “pigtail” rather than a closed end like the coilover spring means they actually sit slightly differently, in such a way that the 3.0” closed spring is a good enough fit

The problem you will find is that OEM springs (which I did investigate somewhat) are about 99% designed to use simple linear springs with various seat sizes, not always the same top and bottom. At the vehicle design stage, rather than use something like a helper, someone like Ford can simply move the entire spring seat and select shock droop travel to work with exactly the spring rate and length desired. The problem is that in order to use a stiffer spring than factory design, you have to start with a shorter spring to get the same compressed height (for ride height)

“Conventional” 5.0” OD on at least one of the seating surfaces is more common. It’s pure weird luck that our stock setup uses such small seat diameters with barrel springs. It’s odd enough that if you look at the lower front perch, it’s adapted from a strut designed to accept a larger lower spring seat (which you may find a way to use, but that will further increase the required droop length.

I did go down the OEM spring rabbit hole as you’re talking about, but seemingly springs are pretty bespoke for each model of car, and short of visiting a junkyard and taking lots of measurements, information on spring dimensions are extremely sparse.
 


Last edited:

Similar threads



Top