https://www.google.com/search?sourc...AQ&q=site:fiestastforum.com+timing+belt+broke
ZERO hits on a broken t-belt.
This thread has a similar topic.
http://www.fiestastforum.com/forum/threads/853-1-6-Ecoboost-quot-Lifetime-quot-Timing-Belt
210hp is 5.7% over stock 198hp.
Manual recommended is 150k.
5.7% of 150k is 141k.
10-12k is considered average for continental US drivers.
150/12 is 12.5 years.
So to be safe, let's say you'll do it in 8 to 10 years, instead of 12.5.
Mileage for that would be 96k-120k.
Future posts to these forums will guide my plans, but with current information, I'll begin peaking at the belt approaching 100k and probably not touch until the 130s or even 150 if it appears to be in solid condition. I know it use to be really common to have to regularly replace serpentine belts, now they virtually last the life of the vehicle short of a pulley seizing. Belt tech has come a long way. I think they were even used with some of the early CVT transmissions.
When inspecting the belt, what you'll want to pay close attention to, is where the "rungs" attach to the belt. My previous vehicle would never break a belt, but it did have a tendency to strip a couple of teeth from one and slipped time by a couple of teeth. It was a non-interference engine though. Usually my first clue that it slipped time was reduce performance and rough idling. Prior to it getting to that point, there would be a lot of cracking in the rubber between the rung on the belt and the base of the belt.
ZERO hits on a broken t-belt.
This thread has a similar topic.
http://www.fiestastforum.com/forum/threads/853-1-6-Ecoboost-quot-Lifetime-quot-Timing-Belt
210hp is 5.7% over stock 198hp.
Manual recommended is 150k.
5.7% of 150k is 141k.
10-12k is considered average for continental US drivers.
150/12 is 12.5 years.
So to be safe, let's say you'll do it in 8 to 10 years, instead of 12.5.
Mileage for that would be 96k-120k.
Future posts to these forums will guide my plans, but with current information, I'll begin peaking at the belt approaching 100k and probably not touch until the 130s or even 150 if it appears to be in solid condition. I know it use to be really common to have to regularly replace serpentine belts, now they virtually last the life of the vehicle short of a pulley seizing. Belt tech has come a long way. I think they were even used with some of the early CVT transmissions.
When inspecting the belt, what you'll want to pay close attention to, is where the "rungs" attach to the belt. My previous vehicle would never break a belt, but it did have a tendency to strip a couple of teeth from one and slipped time by a couple of teeth. It was a non-interference engine though. Usually my first clue that it slipped time was reduce performance and rough idling. Prior to it getting to that point, there would be a lot of cracking in the rubber between the rung on the belt and the base of the belt.