Also, not to be the negative guy... But...
The HP pump runs off the cam.
When the cam is turning a relatively low RPM, lets say 2800rpms, its actually not capable of flowing anywhere near the same amount as it can at 6500rpms. Right? Its not electric. Its engine rpms dependent.
Now... We may only make 220whp right?
What about torque? We're in the 280TQ area already without E85 on our side. But will stick with 280tq on gas.
Now... Double that torque number because like before, E85 takes ROUGHLY ROUGHLY double the volume at the same power level. Now we are at 560Tq of fuel volume.
560ft lbs of torque.... At 2800rpms. The pump is turning slow (compared to its max rpm/flow) and we are asking for a 560tq gasoline output like flow rate (while making 280Tq on E85).
I'm not saying it is a lost cause, lol. Its not. I'm just saying the extremely rough and crude "guess-work" calculations say we really need to tread lightly on E85.
Also more reason to start with E30 and E50 first
You guys may wonder why its ok for the 1.6L ecoboost fusion and escape to use E85... They are tuned to a much lower spec.
We see stock manual trans ST's dyno at 180whp ( is that fair?).
So... Figure at least 15hp less on the other cars. Call it 170whp to be nice. 170whp x 2 = 340whp. And that's being generous I think. So those car's lower overall output means they can stay within the flow limits, and this is also very much so with the torque values.
Wouldn 't it be cool to track and dyno test the same fusion 1.6 ecoboost on 87oct, then switch it over to E85 for 50 miles and re-do the test. I think it would be interesting
Also... Our range on E85 would be like... 45miles, lmao.