QUOTE="Williamson, post: 503769, member: 15832"]Full disclosure, I'm still on the stock airbox. ST200 or an ITG/Peron are on the list (along with crossover piping) but I'm a little surprised it's apparently so heavily choked up by the stock box. Hence the initial surprise to the misunderstanding about the intake.
Luckily I've got some money coming in that is disposable to throw down for a new intake and a retune, and I could live with the power even without.
Luckily I've got some money coming in that is disposable to throw down for a new intake and a retune, and I could live with the power even without.
235 on a Mustang dyno is 275-280 on a dynojet. I dyno’d at that on a Mustang dyno as well witH my first tuner and the car was fast but tossed tons of codes and some that the tUner wanted to blame on Cobb so I bailed and went to Tune+ never looked back that was like over 2 years ago v dynoed at 284 whp on 91 and 284 ft lbs . Oh and yes the car is faster than it was on the first tuner.[/QUOTE]
Misstated 255 whp, brainfart. 275 whp is where I speculate based on cars I ran against.
Adam tuning my S280 too. Decent. Motor limitations apparently.
Gonna dyno on a dynojet and mustang dyno on my 91, 93, and e50 aux fuel tunes probably come spring to compare for my own interest and I am sure the forum will be interested too.