Yes, the R1 Bilstein/M-Sport setup was standard for the R1s, and even offered as a lower cost option for the original naturally aspirated (like the 160 HP ones you mention above) R2 crews who eight did not want to spend the extra $8K+ USD on the Reigers, or who thought that they did not need those for local/Euro national only events.
Even so, those Bilsteins were setup for/valved for rough gravel (although they did also offer a tarmac setup in them as well) stages, and by the time they made their way over here from Poland, they still ran close to $3K USD.
The current R2T 1.0 Ecoboost Fiestas are quite a bit quicker than the original naturally aspirated, 'cammed' 160 HP 1.6 versions, with upwards of 200 HP allowed by the FIA.
Even so, those Bilsteins were setup for/valved for rough gravel (although they did also offer a tarmac setup in them as well) stages, and by the time they made their way over here from Poland, they still ran close to $3K USD.
The current R2T 1.0 Ecoboost Fiestas are quite a bit quicker than the original naturally aspirated, 'cammed' 160 HP 1.6 versions, with upwards of 200 HP allowed by the FIA.
And considering how stiff the standard suspension is on the fiesta st. When there are bumps, Rita there isn’t much travel and the car is jumping here and there. A bit softer setup would allow it to be driven faster.
The current turbo R2s are a different generation compared to the NA cars. More power and especially torque makes it way faster. However the R2t sounds like a vacuum cleaner inside compared to NA R2 Fiesta or NA R2 Peugeot. There just is more sould when a rally car is screaming to 8-9krpm. But of course rallying is all about being fast so there it makes sense to have the turbo engine.