you keep sidestepping the fact I'm agreeing with everything you're saying about how you're not comfortable with the lack of available certifications and parts lists for the whoosh BBK and that is why you won't buy the product.
no one on this thread is disagreeing with you on that.
we are disagreeing with you on your assumptions after that. if you had just stopped at, "i would never buy a brake kit from a company that doesn't provide ISO certs or a parts list" i think you woulda earned all our respect.
but ya kept going and now we're here.
edit: and for whatever it's worth, i don't ever plan on going big brake kit for my Fiesta ST. i'll find all the other ways to increase stopping/decrease brake fade without being forced to slap wheel spacers on my ride/introduce another element to the car that Dearborn never intended (not that i'm judging anyone who does, cause i'm not)
My apologies for not acknowledging that you are in fact agreeing with most of my points. If you're disagreeing about my assumptions about Ron and Whoosh, that's totally fair. But in my defense, I'm just drawing logical conclusions with the spartan info we have on this kit. And this lack of information - whose fault is that? If i were a reseller trying to sell a cheaper alternative to a part that LIVES depended on, I'd provide MUCH more info. At the very least, not be dismissive when asked about it.
I respect this and agree on the most part. Though using iso9000 , 9001, 9002 as some proof of quality control is slightly on the I lack engineering knowledge side. ISO is strictly a manfacturing spec and does not quantify quality control.
In fact Rota Wheels have ISO9001 spec for years it has not kept them from breaking and breaking catastrophically on many occasions. where is the so called quality control lilpartybox is claiming it represents . It’s not their because iso is not a quality control spec it’s a manufacturing spec that people like to lean on to signify quality control i.e. somewhat of a fallacy with how people interpret it.
It‘s actually pretty well documented on the web and even got the joking catch phrase friends don’t let friends run Rota’s. Yet Miata guys track Rota’s constantly. High end wheels tend to bend without breaking and just go out of round.
If you want to use iso to make sure a product is safe you would rule out a lot small company’s like. Pierce motorsports for instance , a lot of small performance manufacturers make great parts that are precision cnc’s to spect but are not iso 9000 .
Plus a lot of suspension manufacturers including MeisterR which you( as do I as well) run lilpartybox are not iso9000 certified! oops better go take off your coilovers right now they are not iso they could be dangerous. Of course you are going to cry that’s ludicrous .
Yup and that’s exactly the point outside of your personel fear everything you have stated is based on conjecture at best and a claim for a manufacturing standard as a reason for it. When the manufacturing standard is not a QC standard it’s strictly a manufacturing standard .
Any company can get ISO certs for their manufacturing if they are willing to spend the money for the certs. It does not automatically make their quality better or their QC great.
There is more to it than that and quite honestly I have been in manufacturing small time. If all companies were ISO certified many small cnc businesses would not exist.
I should add CNC businesses that supply major airplane manufacturers including U.S. government aka Air Force. How I do know this because I have dealt with some of them to make parts in the past and because I had friends who worked for them.
It’s not as simple as some of you think.
Let's go point by point here:
1. ISO 9001 includes QC. Here is an excerpt from one of the members that provide certification. I found MANY other sites that speak to ISO including quality control.
An ISO 9001 Quality Management System is a consistent way of doing things which ensures that your products or services meet your customers’ needs.
Improving your Quality Management System (QMS) to the level required by the ISO, strengthens your business performance; helping to protect it from whatever challenges lie ahead. It also helps to increase your market share and profit potential.
ISO 9001 Quality Management System | ISO Certification | ISO Quality Services Ltd (isoqsltd.com)
Standardizing manufacturing and holding it to a higher standard is obviously a form of quality control. That's not debatable. ISO is the big deal it is because it helps ensure that whatever is being built is held to a higher standard.
2. Rota or any wheel can break under the right circumstances. No wheel is invincible. Nor is any standardization infallible. But not having ANY certification at all for a BBK is way outside my comfort zone.
3. I run Pierce stuff. I wouldn't care if PM was ISO certified. If any of it were to fail, i would still be able to stop my car. It's not risking my life if my strut tower brace snaps. We are debating a very specific product. Not a good example.
4. MR is the better example. Obviously, ISO is not the end all, be all in my decision-making process. I was very clear on the fact that the 100s of good reviews influenced my decision. There aren't any good reviews for TEI. AGAIN, I KNOW IT'S ALL CONJECTURE. But it's my life, I have a right to err on the side of caution. And i urge others to do the same and i'm wrong for that? Unless there is a trove of 100s of reviews on this BBK somewhere i haven't found, ~10 people on this forum running them for what, a year or so, is nowhere near enough to place my trust in this product.
Especially when the seller is being SO opaque. Jared, from MR, was on the site almost daily answering questions and explaining anything and everything we threw at him. Remember? If that were the case for this BBK, my comments would be different. But he is indifferent and that is unacceptable. Be indifferent about an intake, not brakes.
5. And no. Not just any company can get an ISO certification. It's a fairly rigorous inspection. It's not the joke that a DOT sticker on a motorcycle helmet is. It's more accurate to say any company can PAY for the inspection, but it doesn't mean they will pass. We can go all day about ISO but the real issue is this is a no name, mystery BBK. I'm only saying ISO would help since we don't have
any other source of info.
6. I believe you when you say there are US air force suppliers without certs...but the gov't, any gov't, isn't exactly the best example here lol. Tons of things are sold without a cert of any kind. And we all buy them all the time. But again, these are brakes gentleman not a shift knob.
You both continue to comment on my conjecture, but I've repeatedly admitted that it IS conjecture. I knowwww. And you're assuming the opposite of what i'm assuming. Also conjecture. That's all it is. I wish Ron would speak in more detail about the kit but that hasn't happened as of yet. But they ARE extremely uniform and perfectly precise lol.
.... Sure, having checklists and whatnot helps but it doesn't guarantee it.
Agreed. But it does help get a product closer to reliable, repeatable results and I want my brakes to repeatedly stop