Good point. From now on, everyone just PM dyn085 with your questions since he has done all the testing and knows from experience obviously.
Its $30, not $300 like some other useless mods. If each 4hp was $300 a piece, then fine. But at $30, its sorta hard to go wrong.
Some of the guys on here are already at Stg3, but don't want the cost or complexity of upgrading the turbo ( at all ), so a $30 mod to help its efficiency all you can; isn't a bad idea.
Would it be my first mod? No. But really, if we're talking about being worth the money, then leave the car bone factory stock, add E85 and get a tune. Nothing else you can do will touch that ( short of upgrading the turbo ).
Does that mean everything besides a turbo upgrade or E50+ tune is pointless? No...
By Dyn0's reasoning, we shouldn't even add a AP because its $500 and adds... Well.... Nothing if your really asking me. Dyno the car. Then dyno the car on stg1 ots tune. Then rest the ecu to stage0 and dyno again. Bet you don't gain 5hp.
Great, now we start the reading comprehension problem and start adding words/meaning to what people say.
A. I never claimed to 'know everything'. If you look at my initial response to the initial question, my response didn't say to avoid it. I simply said that there's no data to support the need and that if he did he should datalog it. See how that could have legitimately helped the community? We would have
actual proof in one direction or the other.
B. You're
assuming that there's a power gain. With no datalogging proof, we can assume there to not be one as well. That would make it a $30 noise-maker and would therefore be a complete waste of money, with the exception of those that wanted noise without power. And there's nothing wrong with that, because it can be a legitimate desire.
C. Not recommending the AP3 (or any tuning device) and using me as the person that would give such advice is ludicrous as I'm one of the few people that tries to actually look at and analyze data, and without a tuner that's nearly impossible without dumping a ton of money into dyno work.
D. HP isn't the only measurement of power (considering the fact that it's just a mathematical equation based on what's
actually measured), and regardless of what the top-end gains are/aren't, that one single number doesn't paint the entire picture. Significant torque gains in the mid-range contribute to an entirely different driving experience, and as a vendor you should know that. If there were any gain whatsoever I would probably endorse the concept, but not surprisingly there's no actual data.
I'm never surprised when vendors team-up to make claims or want to argue against me using logic or trying to collect data. Just because I don't profit on information/thoughts that I share doesn't make them of any less value, and if anything the inverse is true. I never have to debate these things with Cobb or ATP or any of the other respectable vendors...