Has the stock actuator been proven unreliable and problematic? If so, what are its weaknesses? Sorry if this has been answered elsewhere.
I will say I was told it was an issue . I will say having said that the typical naysayers on the forum will come out of the wood work just because I uttered those words. They love to shoot messengers around here.
jokes aside I do not know beyond what I was told . Mag is definitely suggesting that could be the reason with his hypothesis as to way Adam and Ron recommend it.
It could also be that it just does not hold boost beyond say 26psi with the stock actuator.
Per previous threads about other UK turbo’s fact is in the UK they do not push as much boost as we tend to do here.
That has been stated by certain UK companies and found to be somewhat true.
which leads to the summation…
It could be that because U.S. boost heads tend to go crazy on boost you need a better actuator than stock.
Changing actuators on Turbo’s is not as uncommon as some may think.
Its done all the time and has been for years. So when I was advised to do it I thought nothing of it. I will also add my Turbo runs great and the extra buck and half or so of change did not break my bank so why not. I will also add though the Peron kit comes with the TS 14lb actuator which is interesting as well as they are a UK company and sell it in the UK with their tune and that actuator.
Which brings one to suppose that A: the stock actuator is not consistent per my theory based off mag summations. Of course and B: My thought that indeed the stock actuator will not hold as much boost as the turbo is capable of.
After all Peron is a pretty trusted company in the UK.