View attachment 30189
No offense and Interesting observation, but I never said I was running out of fuel. Air/fuel is fine on my car so it has nothing to do with your assumption. Did you review my datalog?. I can't post a f'ing lugnut for sale on here without someone commenting on it before even seeing it. Once again, I feel the timing on my car which isn't running lean is very conservative as I'm seeing way too little torque vs HP. Obviously low RPM torque isn't going to tax the fuel system like high rpm HP. What's great about my other forums is that they'll read and review data before responding. I wish this forum was the same. Thaks for the pearls of wisdom
Magnetise ST and JDG.
I'm literally comparing our datalogs in excel side by side. So give me a few, I got out of bed for this lol. Are your logs in 3rd or 4th gear? I asked what I asked based on your Datazapp graph (which isn't very good for your datalog90 since you do multiple pulls in it, 91 is much much cleaner)
But what I'm seeing is that you already have higher base timing than I do up top, you have lower charge air temps, and lower afrs than I do. Of course it doesn't mean much if yours are in 4th gear, all of mine are in 3rd. What exactly are you looking for with the additional timing? More "instant" torque, or just more overall power?
edit: here is a small comparison, yours are the left two columns, mine are the right two:
You definitely have less base timing under 4600rpm or so, but it then spikes up to the 5.0*+ range and stays there peaking out at 10.06*. Mine never go above 8.3*, you have more timing than I do top end for sure, but lower down you have less. Your boost comes on earlier than mine though, a good 5psi ahead of me at 2900 rpm.