I’m actually switching from an X47R to an MRX is about a week just to see the difference.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
I’d LOVE to here your opinion between the two. The only reason I’m considering the MRX over the X47 is long term reliability. My gut tells me the MRX will handle heavy track use better. If it’s super laggy, I’ll just stay stock and run 93 and e30 tunes. This new turbo looks to be promising. I don’t think I “need” 400hp but I’ll drive the shit out of it.
I’m interested in the MRX x47 comparo thread!
I would also love to hear the comparison.
Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
Back a few months ago, one member who had a MRX and I did some friendly log-swapping and compared on virtual dyno. We intended to start a thread and post detailed information, but never got around to it because he moved and changed jobs and life got crazy for both of us and we never got all the data together. The hope was to get multiple tunes on different octanes and then dyno both cars and post results, discuss timing and boost and all the good stuff.
I do have one V-dyno chart that we did make from that though, but this is it. It's his 92 octane tune (Randy aka Mountune) and my 93 octane tune (Adam aka Tune+). It's not the best though, we're in entirely different climates (Spokane WA vs. Augusta GA) with different octanes and lots of other variables; he's catless, I'm catted. Different mod choices though the basics are the same.
This picture really shows a good representation of our discussions - his car felt more laggy but powerful when it finally kicked, but tapered off before redline; mine felt much quicker to spool and the power was more linear, keeping till near redline. The curves show it all. I think considering that he's catless, were we to have the same hardware the cars would put out about the same power on the same octane.
All in all I think they're both fine choices, it's all about how you want the car to feel.
Hosted on Fotki
Anyhow hope this helps, sorry to derail thread.