• Sign Up! To view all forums and unlock additional cool features

    Welcome to the #1 Fiesta ST Forum and Fiesta ST community dedicated to Fiesta ST owners and enthusiasts. Register for an account, it's free and it's easy, so don't hesitate to join the Fiesta ST Forum today!


Engine swaps?

OP
B

Based

Senior Member
Messages
805
Likes
84
Location
Nope
Thread Starter #21
You're so misinformed that it's actually funny.

You can get pretty close to 400whp on the fiesta motor with just aux fuel and a big turbo.

To get 500whp out of the 2.0 you are talking fully built engine, aux fuel, big turbo.. probably like another $12,000 to put a 2.0 in the fiesta and make it 500whp.
Wow DHM must be misinformed too because they told me on 93 and aux fuel even the 450r Kit will only get 310-330whp.

Dude I didn't insult you in the slightest. Don't talk to me like I'm stupid.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 


frankiefiesta

1000 Post Club
Messages
1,852
Likes
509
Location
forked river
#22
Wow DHM must be misinformed too because they told me on 93 and aux fuel even the 450r Kit will only get 310-330whp.

Dude I didn't insult you in the slightest. Don't talk to me like I'm stupid.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So you're willing to spend hmmmm probably 10k to swap in a 2.0 but won't mix and store some e30 to gain 70whp
 


OP
B

Based

Senior Member
Messages
805
Likes
84
Location
Nope
Thread Starter #23
So you're willing to spend hmmmm probably 10k to swap in a 2.0 but won't mix and store some e30 to gain 70whp
Dude I am simply curious about the possibility of swaps. Just because I am curious about swaps doesn't mean I'm going to do anything. I'm just seeing what's been done before so I can see what I might want to do.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 


Hijinx

3000 Post Club
U.S. Air Force Veteran
Messages
3,290
Likes
1,669
Location
Auburn, AL, USA
#26
Messages
24
Likes
3
Location
Lake Zurich
#29
1.6 to 2.0, not worth the trouble. I'd rather 1.8 BP swap the fiesta with room to spare with parts available to go 500whp not to mention less electronics and wiring.
 


M-Sport fan

9000 Post Club
Messages
14,459
Likes
7,011
Location
Princeton, N.J.
#30
A YB blocked BDT 2.0 Cossie is also a possibility, although yes, electronics/ECM, AND the need for an east/east setup aftermarket FWD transaxle become major problems at that point.

How much room, and to what displacement can OUR current blocks be bored out to at least get the thing 'square' as far as bore x stroke goes???
 


Messages
201
Likes
30
Location
Hudson
#31
I don't see how it's "retarded" to want to swap an engine into a car. The 1.6 on 93 tops out at about 330whp. I want about 500whp.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why wouldn't you spend your money on a built 1.6? You'll still need to build the 2.0 to get that power. Or you can stroke the 1.6 and get more power for cheaper.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 


OP
B

Based

Senior Member
Messages
805
Likes
84
Location
Nope
Thread Starter #32
Why wouldn't you spend your money on a built 1.6? You'll still need to build the 2.0 to get that power. Or you can stroke the 1.6 and get more power for cheaper.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
i never said I am doing an engine swap.
 


Messages
201
Likes
30
Location
Hudson
#33
i never said I am doing an engine swap.
You in a general sense as in anyone thinking about it. The 1.6 is such a good engine I can't understand wanting to get rid of it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 


Messages
151
Likes
52
Location
Scotland
#34
Thats the V8 rwd fiesta round my local track (Knockhill, Scotland)

[video=youtube;evAMzsQ0ssU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evAMzsQ0ssU[/video]
 


Messages
24
Likes
3
Location
Lake Zurich
#35
The 1.6 engine is already under-square. If you can bore it out that would make it more square and rev higher. I wouldn't stroke it anymore then it is.
 


OP
B

Based

Senior Member
Messages
805
Likes
84
Location
Nope
Thread Starter #36
Thats the V8 rwd fiesta round my local track (Knockhill, Scotland)

[video=youtube;evAMzsQ0ssU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evAMzsQ0ssU[/video]
Yeah I'm doing that


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 


M-Sport fan

9000 Post Club
Messages
14,459
Likes
7,011
Location
Princeton, N.J.
#38
Thats the V8 rwd fiesta round my local track (Knockhill, Scotland)

[video=youtube;evAMzsQ0ssU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evAMzsQ0ssU[/video]
That thing sounds EVIL, and that Quaife 'box is wicked as well (I did not know they even made something which could handle that torque/power, but I guess some of the Brit rallycrossers using their sequentials are up there in that range?).

It IS a 'handful' on track though! [crazyeye]
 


Messages
201
Likes
30
Location
Hudson
#39
The 1.6 engine is already under-square. If you can bore it out that would make it more square and rev higher. I wouldn't stroke it anymore then it is.
I thought stroking would raise the compression and make it rev higher? If I could bore it out and get more power and more revs I'd absolutely do that. I'm still learning about more detailed engine build stuff so bear with me because my knowledge on the subject is slim.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 


Messages
24
Likes
3
Location
Lake Zurich
#40
I thought stroking would raise the compression and make it rev higher? If I could bore it out and get more power and more revs I'd absolutely do that. I'm still learning about more detailed engine build stuff so bear with me because my knowledge on the subject is slim.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Typically, the longer the stroke, the less rev's you can get out of it. Think dirty for a minute, your arm would be tired, same as an engine.
 




Top