I can't see any reason to use less than 93 octane (91 where that's the max available) for a performance car like this. It gets decent gas mileage, and why buy a high-performance car but hinder it from reaching the maximum performance it's capable of to save a little on gas? I'm savings tons on gas even using 93 compared to my previous 11 mpg V-8.
That said, I do think Ford creates confusion by the way it deals with octane in the ST Supplemental Manual. On p.10 it clearly says 87 is recommended, with premium rec'd for severe duty such as trailer towing. On p.7, buried unhelpfully in a stack of engine specs, it shows the maximum hp and torque figures "on 93 octane." As some others have noted, "recommending" the lower octane fuel lets Ford make people think they will spend less on gas. To me, it would be a lot simpler and more honest if they would just recommend premium, and note that you can use regular but it will diminish performance.
That said, I do think Ford creates confusion by the way it deals with octane in the ST Supplemental Manual. On p.10 it clearly says 87 is recommended, with premium rec'd for severe duty such as trailer towing. On p.7, buried unhelpfully in a stack of engine specs, it shows the maximum hp and torque figures "on 93 octane." As some others have noted, "recommending" the lower octane fuel lets Ford make people think they will spend less on gas. To me, it would be a lot simpler and more honest if they would just recommend premium, and note that you can use regular but it will diminish performance.
Sent from my LG-H918 using Tapatalk