Hi Guys,
I just got the Firehawk Indy 500's in 205/40/17 (OEM Size) put on the stock rims over the weekend. I am thinking that I am one of the first Fiesta ST guys in the country to have these put on.
I know there has been a lot of grumbling (myself included) about a lack of good options for our stock size. After BFG discontinued the Sport Comp 2 in our size, we were left with precious few options for a summer tire. I was jumping for joy when these became available because it meant I didn't have to get the Yokohama S-Drives.
This is my third set of tires on the Fiesta ST. The OEM Bridgestones lasted until about 18K. I then went to the Sport Comp 2's which lasted until about 38K, so I am getting pretty average wear for the ST. I will try to compare them to both, though I haven't had the Bridgestones for a year and a half and the BFG's were worn down to almost nothing:
First is about setting expectations: this is a $90 tire. For the most part, I have the mantra that you get what you pay for, with few exceptions. I think the Indy 500 is an exception to that rule. Is it going to challenge the Star Specs or the RE-71R on the track or Auto-X? Most certainly not. Is it really even a challenge for the MPSS or PS4S? No, and it shouldn't be. However, I am looking at it as a comparison to what I have used and what's available in the Ultra-High and Max Summer category in our stock size.
In comparison to the Sport-Comp 2's, the Firehawks fare quite well. They simply have more grip in the dry. I can do full throttle starts and there is no slip, no ESC intervention, nothing. It hooks and goes, through first and second. Granted, I am on a stock car with the exception of the Cobb RMM and Quick Shift Kit. The Sport Comp 2's would lose traction a bit more easily and you had to fight the wheel a bit more, even in the dry. There is NO QUESTION the Indy 500's would outcorner the Sport Comp 2's. Even brand-new before they are fully broken in, they have more grip.
I haven't had a chance to test the wet grip yet (shocking in Portland). From everything I have read they are phenomenal in the wet. I will post my thoughts when we get rainfall next. I never had a big problem with either the BFG or the RE050A's in the rain, as long as you are responsible and reasonable.
Where the Indy 500's don't quite stack up to Sport Comp 2's is in initial turn-in and mid-corner feedback. On the first point, I must clarify that the Indy 500's are brand new and still haven't been broken in and the Sport Comp 2's were worn. I do believe that the response will improve significantly as the tread blocks get a bit of wear, as they are full-depth right now which causes some tread roll which I am almost certain is what I am feeling. I haven't run these tires within an inch of their limits yet but when I do I will post my thoughts on their limits.
The comment about mid-corner feedback echoes what Tire Rack said in their review against the Sport Comp 2's. They simply don't transmit as much feedback about the limits as the SC2's do, though the difference isn't that noticeable and if Tire Rack hadn't mentioned it I probably wouldn't have noticed. It doesn't detract from the experience and for street driving it shouldn't make any difference, and these aren't track tires. I am sure I will get used to it as the SC2's fade to a distant memory. The Indy 500's have more ability than the SC2's, though they don't always tell you they do through the steering wheel in the corners. They WILL pull you around. Moreover, I am sure the feel will improve as the tread gets a bit of wear.
I am hesitant to compare the Indy 500's to the RE050A's as they are a different class of tire (Ultra-High vs. Max), but a lot of people are going to be coming from the RE050A's so I feel it prudent to do a limited comparison.
If you are deciding between going with the RE050A's again or getting the Indy 500's: SAVE YOUR MONEY. Tire Rack has the RE050A's for $175 per tire. That is a rip-off. The Indy 500's are available for $90 per tire. They are not twice the tire that the Indy 500 is. Not even close. The Bridgestone is an OLD tire and it is very clear that development and technology has come A LONG way since 2004.
The Bridgestone does have slightly better turn-in and I am guessing that the ultimate grip may be a little bit higher, but it would be negligible and most of us aren't going to be able to take advantage of that on the street. The Indy 500 is quieter, has a better ride, and I think will be better in the wet.
The Indy 500's are currently the best option for anyone looking for a Ultra-High Performance or MAX summer tire in the stock size. All of the other options are either very old, very expensive, or do not perform very well. This is not a track tire and is obviously not a snow tire, though I have run summer tires and had no issues in rain or near freezing temps as I run them all year round: just be responsible.
I will post more as they break in and I get to drive them in different conditions.
Thanks!
Sean