Perspective Part 2
Scrolled to the bottom of your post and read 270. Lol thanks
What no one on this forum is talking about is what boost really is? It is a measure of restriction. The better you can make a motor breath aka air in, air out, the more efficiently it makes power. Why do we care? Your question originated around daily drivability and the more stress you put on the rods and crank, and the more heat you generate were back to the brighter the bulb the shorter the life.
For example, In the scenario I presented, one of the cars I built, started around you'll never make more than 600rwhp on the stock computer. I not only did it, but made the 822RWHP and 693FTTQ on 15 lbs of boost. Not 20, not 25, not 30. 15. To make it daily drivable was a major undertaking.
To make the power required a modified engine, modified fuel system, modified rear end, modified suspension, braking, and cooling system to get started.
To make it daily drivable required an electric water pump, bigger radiator, lots of fuel added to cool the air coming in at idle, it was a big deal and the car managed to get 26mpg on the hwy. This was a 2002 Trans Am with a 427SB with a procharger.
This car would be better off with a little more displacement and less boost.
You read all of the stuff everyone is doing to this Fiesta, and I do question some of it.
For example, have you ever watched a video of a 350+ HP fiesta leaving the line at a drag strip. The car is spitting and sputtering because it cannot get any traction. Very light car.
People on the forum here are trying to lighten the car when in fact you should not be doing anything to the weight especially if you are adding more power. If you have a pickup and are driving in the snow, what is the first thing you do......you add weight to the back of the car to get traction.
2nd, I don't care what race people will tell you about headers, But when it comes to turbos, the shorter the better especially on a small engine and small turbo. We are talking about milliseconds from the time the exhaust leaves the chamber to the time it gets to the turbo to spin it, but the quicker the air gets to the turbo the faster it spins the turbo. There is something to timing of getting which cylinder to the turbo quicker, but the difference does not justify the cost and certainly not the added heat to the engine compartment that you get with tubular headers and to the engine.
The more power you add the better the lag is. WTF are you for real??????? Yep, because when at a drag strip it is all about getting off the line and getting moving. Your not going to get 20 inch wide tires on the front of your car, so you need help getting off the line and you can make up the difference in time lost on the slow take off, on the back end of the track because you are already moving and as power comes on, traction becomes less of a problem. AKA why there are so many videos of people racing from 50mph. They didn't know how to design the setup of not only the engine but the forced induction they used. One of two things happened, either their turbo was so big, boost didn't come on until way later in the RPM curve or there was so much torque down low, they couldn't get off the line.
2nd, when you are on a road course you are already RPM high, so getting boost to come on is not a problem.
Racing is all about control, and if you have 350+ hp in this little car, and every time you go to launch your car you are sideways and trying to hold the steering wheel straight what fun is that only to show off. Personally if I am racing a FWD car I want to put my foot straight to the floor and have the car get off the line and then have the power come on. That gives me a controlled launch and then all I have to do is hold the wheel straight for the rest of the ride. You also don't want a lot of torque on a road course with a light weight car, because then it becomes very difficult to manage in hard turns. One of the things that makes this car so much fun is in the twistys. Just before the curve you go to accelerate or downshift and accelerate. If you are over torqued, now you have manhandle the car and the fun is gone.
I am not saying add weight, I am saying leave the car as it is weight wise. If you are keeping the stock setup, and want to road race, then making the car lighter makes sense.
As for boost being a restriction, that is a fact. Only one company has messed around with the heads on this car, and cyborg has ported and polished the turbo. That is where the real gains are made and being able to keep the car daily drivable. MAP said when they looked at the mustang heads, they were junk and I believe it. If you look at the LS1 world the #1 first upgrade is improve breathability that is head, header cam exhaust. MAP said they will be working on porting a head later this year. Not soon enough for me.
I strongly believe if the factory log, the turbo and the heads are all opened up, using cyborgs turbo or something along those lines, you will find that spool up happens very quickly and has a very long power band and by opening the heads, you can make more power on less boost, and reduce the strain you get from higher boost. Imagine making 270HP on this car with only 19lbs of boost or less, I could raise the compression from 10:1 to 10.5 to one and gain 30hp or more.
Look at Cyborgs numbers and he says he is pushing it on the tune, and he did nothing to the heads. He just got a bigger compressor wheel, and port and polished the headers. ATP turbo uses the same headers what does that tell you?
The other thing no one has talked about here is price vs performance. We are making close to 200/200 and 210/280 with very little effort at a cost of somewhere between $2500 and 2900 depending on who you buy the stuff from. We do not need to replace the air intake under 300HP. The factory intake does a better job than anything anyone has produced. But when you talk about spending $6000.00 for a twin scroll? For what 100hp? Or $4200 for a turbo, tubular headers, down pipe, and such for 120hp? adding all of the extra heat to the equation you are dramatically killing the clock on the engine.
As for my comments here, everyone has they own experience and some might disagree with what I have said here and that is ok. I am not trying to offend anyone, I am simply offering a different opinion based on my own experience. Over the last 10 years I have spent close to $250,000 on modifying my cars and the one great lesson I learned was ROI (return on investment). While all were a lot of fun at the time, smaller always ends up being better and the less stuff you change on the car the more time you will be able to enjoy the car aka to your question drivability.
I recently purchased a FMIC, charge pipes, Recir BOV, Catted down pipe, 3" exhaust and accessport from MAPERFORMANCE. Why and why not cobb? Price. I am invested $2500.00 and free shipping. Had I purchased the Air Intake I would be $2700 deep, still cheaper than COBB. I am not downing COBB, I am just saying I feel I got at least the same quality product for less money. That's all. I will post my real DYNO'd numbers as soon as I have everything installed and tuned. Virtual DYNO's don't count at least in my book. If you are going to sell something you need to back it up and I suspect that a real dyno is not going to produce the same numbers a virtual dyno produces. The next obvious modification is the heads, then if that does not get me to 270, then I will look at the turbo and porting the log.
and remember I did not do anything to the car until I hit 154,000 miles.
If I inadvertently offended anyone by anything I said here, it was not my intent. I was only trying to offer a different opinion based on my own personal experience. There are always two sides to every coin.