• Sign Up! To view all forums and unlock additional cool features

    Welcome to the #1 Fiesta ST Forum and Fiesta ST community dedicated to Fiesta ST owners and enthusiasts. Register for an account, it's free and it's easy, so don't hesitate to join the Fiesta ST Forum today!


Keeping it simple with Big turbo plans in the future...

Sourskittle

4000 Post Club
Messages
4,567
Likes
861
Location
Lakeland
#21
The cyborg turbo running those high boost numbers definitely effects how hard it is on the intercooler to keep up. A larger turbo on 24psi would have an easier time in 2 ways. #1 less boost makes less heat, and naturally the larger compressor size makes less heat for the cooler to deal with. #2 and I know its your favorite, lol, lag. How much boost over how much time? The cyborg pumping 20psi at 3,000 vs a big turbo taking until 4200 rpm to make 20psi means the cooler deals with high boost for less time. On a road course, #2 would prob even out. But making dyno pulls or V-dyno pulls, its pretty relevant.

And that's just the way it is. Cyborg has positives and negatives. You can't have it all.

As long as the core can FLOW, air/cfm wise, what your large gtx turbo is making, cooling shouldn't be too bad. Like ATP rates there garrett core at 400hp flow wise. But that doesn't actually say anything about its cooling ability. Pretty much any bolt-on cooler we have the option for should be able to flow 260whp, but that's not to say more frontal area wouldn't help make that 260whp stay at 260whp at all times vs being 260whp, then 252whp, then 245whp, then 235whp on a road course. Or a 70degree day vs a 85 degree day. Your power (and tune ) would just be much more reliable, and constant with a larger cooler.

And all that stuff about bigger coolers adding lag, etc etc etc. well... I read corky bell's book 20 years ago too, but in practice, in the real world on modern cars/turbo's. Its just wrong. More frontal area, THEN volume will always make more power vs a smaller core with less frontal exposure. Gotta realize, corky was looking at 1987 buicks and stuff when he wrote that book, lol. Like I've posted before, the srt4 guys tested and tested and tested until they really became the model for "bigger is better, even with a under-sized turbo". They even had dyno proof that a high flowing core, hurt performance on a small/stock turbo vs one that was bigger but did not flow as well". They concluded that the air pasted through the high flow unit so fast, it didn't get cooled as well as a larger china cooler that restricted flow a bit, but offered more internal volume. Think of a thermostat and a radiator. If you take the thermostat out, the car may/will overheat on the interstate. Because the water goes through the rad so fast, it doesn't get cooled. But add a little restriction, and the water gets cooled better.
 


Izzy

Active member
Messages
621
Likes
148
Location
Houston
#22
J-line is great and all, my only draw back is appearance and seeing the end tank connections. I like something that fills the whole gap.
On a stock turbo I just can't bring myself to spend more when it performs so well.

When I decided to go big turbo it's only DHM for me.
 


Hijinx

3000 Post Club
U.S. Air Force Veteran
Messages
3,290
Likes
1,669
Location
Auburn, AL, USA
#23
Thx Hijinx...

Do you think the cooling issue might also be because the Cyborg turbo usually is run at much much higher boost levels (i.e. ~28psi) to achieve higher HP levels? Those very high boost levels will in turn also sharply raise compressor temps which I would think can greatly effect cooling efficiency...

I guess my question for you guys is what if a more efficient / medium turbo upgrade was installed (say a GT25x for instance) that requires much less boost (22~24psi) resulting in much lower compressor air temps to achieve the same power as a 28psi Cyborg does then would a much larger race FMIC still be needed? I don't have quite as lofty goals as some others do and if I can install a GT25x with peak boost at 22~24psi to achieve 260whp than a very large race FMIC might not be necessary?
The issue is going to be efficiency, and airflow. Due to the size, a larger turbo is going to be able to push more air into the cylinder at any given psi. You have to keep in mind that a mass of air and the pressure it's at are separate things. With the Cyborg pushing 28psi you're going to be near or at its edge of efficiency. I don't claim to know all, so I can't tell you exactly why in a succinct manner, but what means is hotter air. It's something to do with the smaller mass of air being compressed more which speeds up the molecules producing hear.

Anyway, now you take a bigger turbo and you can push the same amount of air but at LESS psi. This helps keep the turbo in its efficiency range.

Point in case, Sour made 280whp at 28psi (?) with various methods to keep internal temps down and detonation at bay (meth, ethanol). Whereas my car makes 299whp at 23-24psi on 93.

This is the reasoning that leads us to believe the DHM Race cooler would be well suited for the Cyborg. Simply because it's hot. That's not to say the Cyborg isn't good because I've crawled away from SS Camaros on that thing. It's living proof that peak numbers aren't everything. It spoils quick and holds power, so like with any set up, keeping the charge temps cool is the most important; just more so with it. Not a bad thing, it's just a different set of compromises to work with.

Anyway, you're correct. I don't think you'd need a the DHM or Mishimoto on a GT25 or bigger depending on your goals and usage. But it sure would help a whole damn lot considering my charge temps only rise by 1-3* on a 3rd gear pull.
 


Messages
237
Likes
103
Location
olathe
#24
I have a Cobb FMIC and I ran it with the stock turbo and with my 2560r build.

Now I am getting rid of the Cobb because I am trying to push the small 'big' turbo to the edge of its efficiencies and I just spent about $1100 for DHM to build me the best one I could bolt up, I hate re-doing things but it was worth it to me once I am this far into it.
 


Sourskittle

4000 Post Club
Messages
4,567
Likes
861
Location
Lakeland
#26
I have a Cobb FMIC and I ran it with the stock turbo and with my 2560r build.

Now I am getting rid of the Cobb because I am trying to push the small 'big' turbo to the edge of its efficiencies and I just spent about $1100 for DHM to build me the best one I could bolt up, I hate re-doing things but it was worth it to me once I am this far into it.
And I just don't want to see other people do the same. You prob didn't have the DHM option when you bought the cobb.
 


Messages
237
Likes
103
Location
olathe
#27
And I just don't want to see other people do the same. You prob didn't have the DHM option when you bought the cobb.
No that is true. But at the same time I didn't plan on jacking with the turbo as quickly as I did either.

Best laid plans...
 


Sourskittle

4000 Post Club
Messages
4,567
Likes
861
Location
Lakeland
#28
TlPoint in case, Sour made 280whp at 28psi (?) with various methods to keep internal temps down and detonation at bay (meth, ethanol). Whereas my car makes 299whp at 23-24psi on 93.
.
Great example.
I do actually believe that a DHM cooler would be more important to a cyborg car vs a real big turbo upgraded car.

The cyborg car def push the efficiency envelop in route to making power. No onr has maxed out the compressor wheel yet, but as odd as it sounds, the turbine chocking the exhaust side up is a big part of that. Enter..... The external wastegate. Lol.

Side note... I'm dieing to see a TD04HL-19T on one of these cars. Any takers? Lol.
 


BoostBumps

4000 Post Club
Staff Member
Messages
4,277
Likes
1,032
Location
Arizona
#29
I have a Cobb FMIC and I ran it with the stock turbo and with my 2560r build.

Now I am getting rid of the Cobb because I am trying to push the small 'big' turbo to the edge of its efficiencies and I just spent about $1100 for DHM to build me the best one I could bolt up, I hate re-doing things but it was worth it to me once I am this far into it.
Curious... Had you not beefed up your gt2560r further (i.e. pushing it to its edge of efficiency) and had it set up to run 265 whp / ~22psi @ 3k ~ 6k rpm do you think you still would have needed to upgrade to a large race IC? Just trying to be pragmatic and recalibrate expectations to my own unique set of goals with no intentions of extended track racing...
 


Sourskittle

4000 Post Club
Messages
4,567
Likes
861
Location
Lakeland
#30
BBumps if you don't want the DHM race cooler, I'd say that CP-E would be perfect for what your talking about for a stock fitment. But I think its pretty costly. Like $600?
 


BoostBumps

4000 Post Club
Staff Member
Messages
4,277
Likes
1,032
Location
Arizona
#31

Sourskittle

4000 Post Club
Messages
4,567
Likes
861
Location
Lakeland
#32
Dang man.... $700 for a factory fitment size is really rough to swallow. Its def not the product. Just wow... $700 is $700 !! Lol. I'd def have to got the DHM direction since its so close in cost. But if you just can't do it ( humor me and tell me why please, lol ), then I guess $700 is as good as $800.
 


BoostBumps

4000 Post Club
Staff Member
Messages
4,277
Likes
1,032
Location
Arizona
#33
dang man.... $700 for a factory fitment size is really rough to swallow. Its def not the product. Just wow... $700 is $700 !! Lol. I'd def have to got the dhm direction since its so close in cost. But if you just can't do it ( humor me and tell me why please, lol ), then i guess $700 is as good as $800.
Is that expensive? LOL! j/k ;)
 


Messages
237
Likes
103
Location
olathe
#34
Curious... Had you not beefed up your gt2560r further (i.e. pushing it to its edge of efficiency) and had it set up to run 265 whp / ~22psi @ 3k ~ 6k rpm do you think you still would have needed to upgrade to a large race IC? Just trying to be pragmatic and recalibrate expectations to my own unique set of goals with no intentions of extended track racing...
If you want to run things in the safer range there is no need for bigger than the factory fitment stuff. Before I started the overhaul it made 276whp at 24lbs, but it wouldn't do that all day because of heat soak, I started to get knock issues on pump gas. If you are to compare it to a standard 2560r, the standard would benefit even more from the larger IC because my wheel is the gtx design which has higher efficiency so the same pressure on the standard wheel will produce more heat. I am hoping with the new 750hp core I can reliably run like 26lbs on pump and more on race gas.

If you just want something to be GOOD but not trying to max it out, then there are great options to choose from, no need to get crazy chasing every last horsepower.
 


BoostBumps

4000 Post Club
Staff Member
Messages
4,277
Likes
1,032
Location
Arizona
#35
If you want to run things in the safer range there is no need for bigger than the factory fitment stuff. Before I started the overhaul it made 276whp at 24lbs, but it wouldn't do that all day because of heat soak, I started to get knock issues on pump gas. If you are to compare it to a standard 2560r, the standard would benefit even more from the larger IC because my wheel is the gtx design which has higher efficiency so the same pressure on the standard wheel will produce more heat. I am hoping with the new 750hp core I can reliably run like 26lbs on pump and more on race gas.

If you just want something to be GOOD but not trying to max it out, then there are great options to choose from, no need to get crazy chasing every last horsepower.
thanks! much appreciated...just waiting to see what MAP develops and releases before I take the leap!
 


J2FoRS

Senior Member
Messages
819
Likes
186
Location
Central
#37
I have a Cobb FMIC and I ran it with the stock turbo and with my 2560r build.

Now I am getting rid of the Cobb.....
Getting rid of Cobb eh! Look my way when the time comes! (Unless MAP rocks my world first)
 




Top